Re: vacuum row?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum row?
Date: 2006-06-25 03:29:15
Message-ID: 20060625032915.GE5316@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Woodward wrote:
> I originally suggested a methodology for preserving MVCC and everyone is
> confusing it as update "in place," this isnot what I intended.

It doesn't make sense, but maybe vacuuming a page would. Naturally, it
would need to wholly scan all the indexes to clean'em up, so it's
probably not a good idea in general.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

  • vacuum row? at 2006-06-24 18:29:19 from Mark Woodward

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2006-06-25 06:49:32 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-06-25 02:31:28 Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions