| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Ranges for well-ordered types |
| Date: | 2006-06-11 18:24:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20060611182456.GC20757@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 11:22:41AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> You're probably going to have to give up on B-Tree indexes for PERIODs, and
> look towards GiST. For one thing, I would see UNIQUE in the context of a
> PERIOD defined as non-overlapping. e.g.:
If GiST could define UNIQUE indexes, this probably would've been done
already. Fix that, and the index itself will appear shortly
afterwards...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-06-11 18:50:36 | Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(), |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-06-11 18:22:41 | Re: Ranges for well-ordered types |