Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work
Date: 2006-06-09 13:58:02
Message-ID: 20060609135802.GE19659@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Hmm, I take that back. I updated to the current CVS tip on this machine
> > and now I don't see the problem. Without EXPLAIN ANALYZE, the times are
> > around 115-117 ms. With EXPLAIN ANALYZE, 149-152ms.
>
> At the moment, CVS HEAD still has the sampling patch in it. You need to
> be looking at 8.1, or HEAD from several weeks ago, to see the full
> impact of gettimeofday-every-time. (I imagine Simon's strace count
> is wrong for the same reason.)

Ok, then I re-retract, because the test I posted previously was done
with 8.1.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-06-09 14:00:20 Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work
Previous Message Aaron Bingham 2006-06-09 13:55:04 Re: Fabian Pascal and RDBMS deficiencies in fully implementing