Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder
Date: 2006-06-08 19:06:01
Message-ID: 20060608190601.GB19694@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> >Andrew,
> >
> >>What happened was that Tom objected to (or at least queried the need
> >>for) the patch on the grounds that it was bloat that nobody had asked
> >>for. And when I asked I wasn't exactly deluged with requests to commit,
> >>so I concluded that it was not generally wanted.
> >
> >Did you poll on -hackers or on -patches? A *lot* less people read
> >-patches.
>
> Yeah. true. Although, I must say that I discovered very early on in my
> pg-hacking experience that unless you read -patches too you don't really
> know what's going on ;-)

Actually reading -committers is also a must, because you then know that
something is really going on and it's not just chatter.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A.M. 2006-06-08 19:08:04 Re: Ending EXPLAIN ANALYZE early (was Re: That EXPLAIN
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-06-08 19:01:26 Re: Ending EXPLAIN ANALYZE early (was Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-06-08 19:18:36 Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-06-08 18:54:35 Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder