Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder
Date: 2006-06-08 18:47:56
Message-ID: 200606081147.56746.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew,

> What happened was that Tom objected to (or at least queried the need
> for) the patch on the grounds that it was bloat that nobody had asked
> for. And when I asked I wasn't exactly deluged with requests to commit,
> so I concluded that it was not generally wanted.

Did you poll on -hackers or on -patches? A *lot* less people read
-patches.

This has been a problem in the past. I'd generally ask that, if a patch
which was discussed on -hackers gets rejected on -patches, that discussion
be brought back to -hackers. Often the people who supported the original
feature are not on -patches and then are unpleasantly surprised when the
feature they though was accepted doesn't show up in the next version.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2006-06-08 18:49:41 Running a query twice to ensure cached results.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-06-08 18:44:44 Re: ADD/DROP INHERITS

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-06-08 18:54:35 Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-06-08 18:39:55 Re: [HACKERS] drop if exists remainder