From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules |
Date: | 2006-05-31 06:44:16 |
Message-ID: | 20060531064416.GA23169@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:20:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now that the magic-block patch is in, we need to revisit this bit of the
> discussion. I'm for making lack of a magic block an ERROR immediately.
> I don't see the point of waiting; in fact, if we wait till freeze we'll
> just make the breakage more concentrated. At the very least it ought
> to be a WARNING immediately, because a LOG message is just not visible
> enough.
If you like I can send a patch that adds it to all of contrib and some
of the other places required so that make check passes...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-05-31 07:22:20 | Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2006-05-31 06:30:03 | Re: LinkedIn |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-31 09:33:59 | Re: [PATCH] Add support for GnuTLS |
Previous Message | uol | 2006-05-30 22:54:19 | Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection |