| From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jeff Amiel <jamiel(at)istreamimaging(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? |
| Date: | 2006-05-28 16:20:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20060528162008.GA69635@winnie.fuhr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 12:12:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The other problem that the archive pages have had since forever is the
> tendency to show a few garbage "[no subject]" entries near the top of
> the newest page for a list. These always point to what seem to be
> partial messages. I do not know if this represents the archiving
> process storing bad data, or the web page generator misinterpreting
> what's stored.
I investigated this several months ago and suggested a possible
cause: that a paragraph beginning with "From " is being parsed as
the beginning of a new message.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2006-02/msg00083.php
--
Michael Fuhr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-05-29 14:55:02 | Re: [HACKERS] anoncvs still slow |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-28 16:12:10 | Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? |