| From: | <operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users |
| Date: | 2006-05-24 16:26:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20060524162629.95009.qmail@web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/23/2228225
here is an interesting thread regarding speed
issues...
bottom line - some real life users have compared pgsql
to mysql in *some* cases and pgsql was faster.
imho, both are acceptably fast for the vast majority
of applications (which is why i went with features -
not the least of which was the license) and if it gets
so big it grinds to a halt, you are likely in the
commercial db space, anyway.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrej Ricnik-Bay | 2006-05-24 18:25:22 | Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users |
| Previous Message | sam karush | 2006-05-24 01:13:20 | Re: PG on zeta 1.0 |