Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-20 00:19:48
Message-ID: 200605200019.k4K0JmX13852@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

> > Fortunately for us, MySQL foster open development, which
> > means they will never catch us in the long run.

Sorry, I meant to say:

Fortunately for us, MySQL _do_ _not_ foster open development, which
means they will never catch us in the long run.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-05-20 06:23:21 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-19 23:05:53 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-20 00:25:17 Re: [HACKERS] patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats.
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2006-05-19 23:53:10