| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: UNSUBSCRIBE |
| Date: | 2006-05-10 18:10:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20060510181051.GB11382@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:15:11 -0400,
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Maybe the real problem is at the other end of the process, ie we should
> require some evidence of a greater-than-room-temp IQ to subscribe in the
> first place?
I suspect it is more lazyiness that smarts. That had to at least figure out
how to respond to the confirm message in the first place in order to get
subscribed.
My theory is that they don't want to take the trouble to figure out how to
unsubscribe when they (think that they) can just send a message to the list
(not even the admin) asking to be unsubscribed and it will (well actually won't
on these lists) happen.
Maybe posts with "unsubscribe" in the subject could be held for moderation
and/or get an automated reply with instructions for unsubscribing.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-10 18:40:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal |
| Previous Message | Markus Schaber | 2006-05-10 15:59:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal |