Re: Slow restoration question

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slow restoration question
Date: 2006-05-03 22:00:30
Message-ID: 20060503220028.GC16533@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 04:30:32PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>If you've not tried bonnie++ on a limited memory machine, you really
>should.

Yes, I have. I also patched bonnie to handle large files and other such
nifty things before bonnie++ was forked. Mostly I just didn't get much
value out of all that, because at the end of theago day optimizing for
bonnie just doesn't equate to optimizing for real-world workloads.
Again, if it's useful for your workload, great.

Mike Stone

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-05-04 12:27:47 Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay.
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2006-05-03 21:30:32 Re: Slow restoration question