Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>, Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios
Date: 2006-05-02 19:07:41
Message-ID: 20060502190741.GI15291@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Vivek Khera wrote:
> >
> > On May 2, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Tony Wasson wrote:
> >
> > >The script detects a wrap at 2 billion. It starts warning once one or
> > >more databases show an age over 1 billion transactions. It reports
> > >critical at 1.5B transactions. I hope everyone out there is vacuuming
> > >*all* databases often.
> >
> > Something seems wrong... I just ran your script against my
> > development database server which is vacuumed daily and it said I was
> > 53% of the way to 2B. Seemed strange to me, so I re-ran "vacuum -a -
> > z" to vacuum all databases (as superuser), reran the script and got
> > the same answer.
>
> That's right, because a database's age is only decremented in
> database-wide vacuums.

Forget it ... I must be blind ...

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2006-05-02 19:12:37 Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios
Previous Message Tony Wasson 2006-05-02 19:06:30 Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios