| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Altering view ownership doesn't work ... |
| Date: | 2006-04-30 16:54:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20060430165423.GE11912@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:34:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> 2. Run setRuleCheckAsUser during rule load rather than rule store.
>
> #2 is a lot simpler, and would fix the problem for existing broken rules
> whereas #1 would not, so I'm kind of inclined to go with that. I doubt
> there'd be any meaningful performance hit --- parsing the stored form
> of a rule is relatively expensive anyway, so we cache the results.
FWIW, I think #2 is better also. It's the easiest way to ensure the
correct result and the performence isn't enough of a problem to worry
about doing it a different way.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-30 17:17:15 | Re: Altering view ownership doesn't work ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-30 16:34:42 | Altering view ownership doesn't work ... |