| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
| Date: | 2006-04-26 22:09:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20060426220929.GY97354@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:27:18AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> If you haven't actually run a heavy benchmark of postgresql on the two
> architectures, please don't make your decision based on other
> benchmarks. Since you've got both a D920 and an X2 3800, that'd be a
> great place to start. Mock up some benchmark with a couple dozen
> threads hitting the server at once and see if the Intel can keep up. It
Or better yet, use dbt* or even pgbench so others can reproduce...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-26 22:14:47 | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
| Previous Message | Steve Poe | 2006-04-26 20:08:59 | Re: Introducing a new linux readahead framework |