| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: new survey |
| Date: | 2006-04-21 17:23:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20060421172353.GA49405@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:33:10AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:38:55AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> > I'm stealing this idea from http://www.postgresqlfr.org/?q=node/641 but adding
> > a twist:
> >
> > Aside from pl/pgsql, which procedural language do you use most often?
>
> I think SQL counts as one as our version is Turing-complete :)
Yeah, but we already know you're the only one who'll vote for it, so it
doesn't matter. :P
BTW, anyone thought about soliciting survey ideas on the website?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-21 17:26:09 | Re: Gborg still down |
| Previous Message | Janet Bulgakova | 2006-04-21 16:01:30 | [webmaster] PostgreSQLDirect .NET from Core Lab |