Re: float8 regression test failure in head

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: float8 regression test failure in head
Date: 2006-04-20 15:56:29
Message-ID: 200604201556.k3KFuTP12802@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Don't we have some of these platforms on the build farm. Are they
> > failing?
>
> canary, gazelle, and osprey all pass this test just fine. Before
> accepting any patches in this area we'd better find out the difference
> between the OP's netbsd system and those machines.

Agreed.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-04-20 15:56:32 Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-04-20 15:50:37 Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP