Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: NLS vs error processing, again

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, jw(dot)pgsql(at)sduept(dot)com
Subject: Re: NLS vs error processing, again
Date: 2006-04-20 10:55:48
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'm far from an expert on this, but the gettext documentation
> > indicates that it tries to translate the .po file contents into
> > whatever encoding is implied by LC_CTYPE.
> Correct.  That is just one more reason to have server encoding, 
> LC_COLLATE, and LC_CTYPE matching.  In practice, there is hardly a 
> reason to have LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE be different, so the problem 
> should not be that big.

Is there any TODO here?

  Bruce Momjian

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-04-20 11:09:38
Subject: Re: BUG #2400: 'Ã' considered invalid UTF-8 character
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-04-20 10:50:27
Subject: Re: PGSTAT: bind(2): Can't assign requested address

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group