| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Who is responsible for ECPG? |
| Date: | 2006-04-19 16:14:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20060419161423.GM15420@svana.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I'm wondering who is responsible for ECPG since there appear to be a
number questionable statements which may or may not be bugs. Do we have
a resident expert?
Examples:
src/interfaces/ecpg/ecpglib/execute.c line 871
To my untrained eye it looks like after the first time through the loop
it's going to double-free nval.
src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/numeric.c line 364
A numeric is allocated but leaked if set_var_from_str fails.
src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c line 169
Again, memory leak if risnull fails
Yes, these are from the coverity report. Who knows enough about ECPG to
decide what's a real bug and what's just bad assumptions?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-19 16:19:49 | Re: Who is responsible for ECPG? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-04-19 16:12:42 | Re: Google SoC--Idea Request |