From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Rajesh Kumar Mallah" <mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com>, andy(dot)shellam(at)mailnetwork(dot)co(dot)uk, "Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Show tables query |
Date: | 2006-04-02 17:38:19 |
Message-ID: | 200604021938.20644.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Unfortunately, the SQL committee did tremendous damage to that
> argument by changing the definitions of some of those views in
> SQL2003 :-(
The only changes to existing views were one renamed column and two or
three cases with relaxed permission checks so that more objects are now
shown. I do not expect any application to break.
> (We haven't caught up to the SQL2003 behavior yet, but I believe
> Peter Eisentraut is working on it for PG 8.2.)
I'm committing it now. Thanks for reminding me -- I had almost
forgotten about that patch. :)
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-04-02 19:34:48 | Re: semctl(): Invalid argument |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-04-02 17:37:58 | semctl(): Invalid argument |