| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? |
| Date: | 2006-04-01 15:34:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200604011734.59043.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> The problem is that PostgreSQL is moving out of the realm of
> "hard-core geeks only" and more into the mainstream.
Someone who has a non-default Perl installation is hardly mainstream.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-04-01 15:42:34 | Re: pg_class catalog question... |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-01 15:21:14 | Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-04-01 15:47:39 | Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-01 15:21:14 | Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? |