| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_class catalog question... |
| Date: | 2006-03-31 15:41:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20060331154118.GB12579@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 3/31/06, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> wrote:
> > What if you put your char[64] before relhassubclass, then you
> > don't change CLASS_TUPLE_SIZE.
>
> Thought about that... but it would be an ugly place for this column.
> I know I could get around it by renumbering the attribute, but that's
> just a kludge.
What are you using a char[64] for anyway? You should probably consider
using NameData, if you want to store an identifier.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-03-31 15:45:15 | Re: pg_class catalog question... |
| Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-03-31 15:36:22 | Re: pg_class catalog question... |