Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB &

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, Kenji Morishige <kenjim(at)juniper(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB &
Date: 2006-03-21 10:08:53
Message-ID: 20060321100852.GB15742@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 03:51:35PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> >
> >I think Freebsd 'Inactive' corresponds pretty closely to Linux's
> >'Inactive Dirty'|'Inactive Laundered'|'Inactive Free'.
> >
>
> Hmmm - on second thoughts I think I've got that wrong :-(, since in
> Linux all the file buffer pages appear in 'Cached' don't they...
>
> (I also notice that 'Inactive Laundered' does not seem to be mentioned
> in vanilla - read non-Redhat - 2.6 kernels)
>
> So I think its more correct to say Freebsd 'Inactive' is similar to
> Linux 'Inactive' + some|most of Linux 'Cached'.
>
> A good discussion of how the Freebsd vm works is here:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/arch-handbook/vm.html
>
> In particular:
>
> "FreeBSD reserves a limited amount of KVM to hold mappings from struct
> bufs, but it should be made clear that this KVM is used solely to hold
> mappings and does not limit the ability to cache data."

It's worth noting that starting in either 2.4 or 2.6, linux pretty much
adopted the FreeBSD VM system (or so I've been told).
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Cottenceau 2006-03-21 10:13:06 Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, advices to tweak cost constants?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-03-21 10:05:18 Re: data doesnt get saved in the database / idle in transaction