Re: [PATCHES] PL/pgSQL: #option select_into_1_row (was SELECT

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] PL/pgSQL: #option select_into_1_row (was SELECT
Date: 2006-03-21 03:32:12
Message-ID: 200603210332.k2L3WCU16255@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Are we agreed this is the way we want to control this?
>
> AFAICT, no one except Matt wants this feature at all, so I'd much prefer
> to drop the whole idea. I think it's a insufficiently justified kluge.

Fine. Unless I hear from the non-kludge croud, it is dropped. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-03-21 03:34:33 Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-21 03:30:39 Re: [PATCHES] PL/pgSQL: #option select_into_1_row (was SELECT INTO

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-03-21 03:34:33 Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-21 03:30:39 Re: [PATCHES] PL/pgSQL: #option select_into_1_row (was SELECT INTO