From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] PL/pgSQL: #option select_into_1_row (was SELECT |
Date: | 2006-03-21 03:32:12 |
Message-ID: | 200603210332.k2L3WCU16255@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Are we agreed this is the way we want to control this?
>
> AFAICT, no one except Matt wants this feature at all, so I'd much prefer
> to drop the whole idea. I think it's a insufficiently justified kluge.
Fine. Unless I hear from the non-kludge croud, it is dropped. ;-)
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-03-21 03:34:33 | Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-21 03:30:39 | Re: [PATCHES] PL/pgSQL: #option select_into_1_row (was SELECT INTO |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-03-21 03:34:33 | Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-21 03:30:39 | Re: [PATCHES] PL/pgSQL: #option select_into_1_row (was SELECT INTO |