Re: PostgreSQL committer history?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
Date: 2006-03-09 05:09:25
Message-ID: 200603090509.k2959PA24587@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
[ There is text before PGP section. ]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> > Right. It is a case where the volume of patches just overwhelms us and
> > we give them commit access. It isn't "trust", and the only downside I
> > see to commit vs. non-commit users is the delay in getting things into
> > CVS. The delay used to be 24-48 hours, but as my responsibilities have
> > grown, the delay has grown as well. I am not sure how to fix that.
>
> Delegate that responsibility to the others that have commit access. If
> that's not enough, grant some more people commit access so they can
> apply the already approved patches. And stop traveling all over the
> world so much. :)

The patch queues are open and committers are encourages to apply them.
Neil and Tom do it sometimes. I then remove the item and update any
TODO entries.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-03-09 05:22:58 MySQL million tables
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2006-03-09 05:06:10 Re: PostgreSQL committer history?