| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Dirk Riehle <dirk(at)riehle(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
| Date: | 2006-03-08 22:07:09 |
| Message-ID: | 200603082207.k28M79P21148@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 13:57 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 10:37, Neil Conway wrote:
> > > Not as far as I know -- the website has a list of current committers,
> >
> > It does? Where is that?
>
> Oh, I thought http://www.postgresql.org/developer/bios had it, but it
> doesn't. There's a case to be made for publicizing this information more
> clearly: having the commit bit is a moderately important social
> indicator among CVS-using open source projects.
Committers go through the same approval process as non-committers, so it
is only the physical commit action that separates committers from
non-committers, so for us, commit privileges aren't a good indicator.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2006-03-08 22:26:44 | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2006-03-08 21:45:56 | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |