| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz |
| Cc: | ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Subject: | Re: pg_freespacemap question |
| Date: | 2006-03-07 23:42:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20060308.084213.74728113.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > BTW, I found the answer to my question myself by reading the source
> > code: if that's an index, then blockfreebytes is explicitly set to 0.
> > I suggest that this should be noted in the README and in this case
> > blockfreebytes is better to set to NULL, rather than 0.
> >
>
> Good points! I had not noticed this test case. Probably NULL is better
> than zero.
Just for curiousity, why FSM gathers info for indexes? I thought FSM
is only good for tables.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-03-07 23:49:24 | Re: pg_freespacemap question |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-03-07 23:31:36 | Re: pg_freespacemap question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-03-07 23:49:24 | Re: pg_freespacemap question |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-03-07 23:31:36 | Re: pg_freespacemap question |