Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, ben(at)coverity(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL
Date: 2006-03-07 09:24:09
Message-ID: 20060307092409.GC31738@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:50:15PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >I thought we ran the Converity analysis a year ago and cleaned up the
> >warnings, so I am surprised at our high number, but I assume they are
> >mostly noise.
>
> Got an account and will take a look at the details this evening ... :)

Are the people who look at the results allowed to tell the rest of us
what kind of bugs are involved (ie trivial or otherwise)? I mean,
presumably they can't cut and paste the results to the mailing list but
are we going to see anything other than a list of bug-fixes for
(apparently) unreported bugs?

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2006-03-07 10:23:33 Re: Problemas with gram.y
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-03-07 09:06:11 Re: FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to PLCheck failure