Re: pg.conf re-reading in signal handler or at next return

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Markus Bertheau <mbertheau(dot)pg(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg.conf re-reading in signal handler or at next return
Date: 2006-03-07 03:01:43
Message-ID: 200603070301.k2731hv18417@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Code comment patch applied. Thanks.
>
> The comment was in fact correct as it stood, though in different ways
> for the postmaster and backend --- in the postmaster it alludes to the
> fact that we only enable signals at one point in the postmaster loop.

OK, patch backed out.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-07 03:10:25 Re: Plan for resetting commented postgresql.conf vars at sighup
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-03-07 02:29:30 Re: [PATCHES] LDAP auth