| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, CG <cgg007(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes |
| Date: | 2006-03-03 20:04:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20060303200452.GB9051@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >>The reason I'm hesitant to add a bunch more cross-type operators is
> >>mainly that we have too darn many operators named "=" already. I've
> >>seen in recent profiling tests that it's taking the parser a noticeable
> >>amount of time to decide which one is meant.
>
> Speaking of parsers, did anyone else notice that gcc in its latest
> release has ripped out the bison based parser for C and Objective-C in
> favor of a hand cut RD parser?
Yeah, I did. I wonder what sort of effort they went to write the new
parser.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-03-03 20:12:55 | Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-03-03 19:58:05 | Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes |