Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?
Date: 2006-03-02 23:22:38
Message-ID: 200603030022.38873.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Craig A. James wrote:
> Unfortunately, we're also using a second library (OpenBabel) that is
> written in C++. A good portion of the code I've written is a wrapper
> layer that hides the C++ objects and presents a simple C wrapper that
> works for Postgres.

I suggest if you want to get any concrete advice out of this, post us
the commands that you execute and the error messages that you get.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-03-02 23:23:44 Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Summit, Call for Contributions
Previous Message John 2006-03-02 23:18:12 Installation problem