Re: Wish: remove ancient constructs from Postgres

From: Christopher Weimann <csw(at)k12hq(dot)com>
To: Andrus Moor <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wish: remove ancient constructs from Postgres
Date: 2006-02-27 22:56:32
Message-ID: 20060227225632.GB98075@tektite.k12usa.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 02/26/2006-10:36AM, Andrus Moor wrote:
>
> It is difficult to write standard-compliant code in Postgres.
> There are a lot of constructs which have SQL equivalents but are still used
> widely, even in samples in docs!
>
> For example, there are suggestions using
>
> now()::CHAR!=foo
>
> while the correct way is
>
> CAST(CURRENT_DATE AS CHAR)<>foo
>
> now() function, :: and != operators should be removed from language.
>
> I like the Python logic: there is one way

Actually the python logic is

"There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it."

Perhaps the suggestion should be to only use the SQL standard forms in
the documentation, making them the 'obvious' way.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-02-28 00:36:17 In case nobody has seen this survey from Sun ...
Previous Message Jebus 2006-02-27 22:12:44 audit tables adding columns