Re: WIP: further sorting speedup

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: further sorting speedup
Date: 2006-02-23 02:21:38
Message-ID: 20060223022138.GT86022@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:40:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "tape". This increases the space needed by 8 or 12 bytes (depending on
> sizeof(Datum)) per in-memory tuple, but doesn't cost anything as far as

Stupid question... how are varlena's handled in Datum?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-02-23 03:18:48 Re: WIP: further sorting speedup
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-02-23 00:56:54 Re: OS X shared memory documentation