Re: AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) in 8.1.3

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) in 8.1.3
Date: 2006-02-20 07:37:40
Message-ID: 20060220073740.GB12673@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:32:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Would you try the patch proposed at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00299.php
> and see if it fixes the problem? That patch has *not* gotten applied,
> probably because no one confirmed that it worked.

This test is different, it checks that getaddrinfo has four args. I'm
not sure if it's important but if you just want to check the function
exists, just checking for:

[return getaddrinfo ? 0 : 1;],

Will check for existance.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2006-02-20 07:49:30 Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2006-02-20 06:58:11 Re: postgresql query string length limit