| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: Search machine is ready |
| Date: | 2006-02-17 18:37:29 |
| Message-ID: | 200602171337.29595.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Friday 17 February 2006 09:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2006 17:40 schrieb Dave Page:
> > - Vendor changes. I don't like to run packages I know to have been
> > changed by the vendor - for example, it was noted the other day that the
> > Debian PostgreSQL packages contains patches that aren't in PGDG releases.
> > In this case the only OS vendor I would trust with a modified PostgreSQL
> > is Red Hat, for fairly obvious reasons.
>
> Clearly, you have never looked into the Debian packages. Otherwise you
> would have seen that the patches are completely trivial and not related to
> changing any functionality.
Clearly somebody hasn't looked into the Debian packages, lest they would be
familiar with the completely debian specific binaries like clusterdb and
pg_wrapper...
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-02-17 19:15:56 | Re: Search machine is ready |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-02-17 17:31:36 | Re: Search machine is ready |