Re: Patch Submission Guidelines

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Patch Submission Guidelines
Date: 2006-02-15 01:42:47
Message-ID: 200602142042.47483.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Tuesday 14 February 2006 16:00, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > I would like to suggest that we increase substantially the FAQ entries
> > relating to patch submission. By we, I actually mean please could the
> > committers sit down and agree some clarified written guidelines?
>
> As I remember, there is a disinclination to increase the size of the
> FAQ very much. This suggests maintaining it as a seperate document. Or
> alternatively attach it as an appendix to the main documentation.
>

Huh? The current developers FAQ is at least 1/2 the size of the main FAQ. I
think adding a submission on patch submission guidelines is a great idea.
I'll have a patch based on Simon's post to -patches ready in the next 24
hours unless someone is really going to object.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2006-02-15 02:47:05 Re: Patch Submission Guidelines
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-02-15 00:04:35 Re: Patch Submission Guidelines

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2006-02-15 02:47:05 Re: Patch Submission Guidelines
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-02-15 00:04:35 Re: Patch Submission Guidelines