pgsql: > Actually, if you submit a patch that says either "SCROLL is the

From: momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian)
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: > Actually, if you submit a patch that says either "SCROLL is the
Date: 2006-02-12 19:02:15
Message-ID: 20060212190215.7412E9DC81D@postgresql.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Log Message:
-----------
> Actually, if you submit a patch that says either "SCROLL is the
default"
> or "NO SCROLL is the default", it will be rejected as incorrect. The
> reason is that the default behavior is different from either of these,
> as is explained in the NOTES section.

Ok, so *that's* where the bit about the query plan being simple enough.
Based on that, ISTM that it should be premissable for us to decide that
a cursor requiring a sort isn't "simple enough" to support SCROLL.

In any case, here's a patch that makes the non-standard behavior easier
for people to find.

Jim C. Nasby

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref:
declare.sgml (r1.34 -> r1.35)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/declare.sgml.diff?r1=1.34&r2=1.35)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-12 19:02:28 pgsql: > Actually, if you submit a patch that says either "SCROLL is the
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-12 18:50:46 pgsql: Update FAQ latest version