From: | momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: > Actually, if you submit a patch that says either "SCROLL is the |
Date: | 2006-02-12 19:02:15 |
Message-ID: | 20060212190215.7412E9DC81D@postgresql.org |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Log Message:
-----------
> Actually, if you submit a patch that says either "SCROLL is the
default"
> or "NO SCROLL is the default", it will be rejected as incorrect. The
> reason is that the default behavior is different from either of these,
> as is explained in the NOTES section.
Ok, so *that's* where the bit about the query plan being simple enough.
Based on that, ISTM that it should be premissable for us to decide that
a cursor requiring a sort isn't "simple enough" to support SCROLL.
In any case, here's a patch that makes the non-standard behavior easier
for people to find.
Jim C. Nasby
Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref:
declare.sgml (r1.34 -> r1.35)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/declare.sgml.diff?r1=1.34&r2=1.35)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-12 19:02:28 | pgsql: > Actually, if you submit a patch that says either "SCROLL is the |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-12 18:50:46 | pgsql: Update FAQ latest version |