Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

Patch applied. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 20:03 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > Changes as discussed. "singletransaction.patch" attached.
> >
> > I meant to ask, why is this not the default or only behavior?
>
> Historically, it didn't work that way, so I hadn't thought to change
> that behaviour. We could I suppose... but I'm happy with just an option
> to do --single-transaction.
>
> > Your
> > patch does not contain a documentation update, and so the user has no
> > information about why to use this option or not.
>
> I was waiting for tech approval of the patch before writing the docs. A
> doc patch is enclosed.
>
> Best Regards, Simon Riggs

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073