Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, nhrcommu(at)rochester(dot)rr(dot)com
Subject: Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and
Date: 2006-02-11 13:53:35
Message-ID: 20060211095134.W6751@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Gavin M. Roy wrote:

> The Sleepycat purchase seems to be more of the no-brainer boxing MySQL
> into a corner.

I'm not so much worried about MySQL as the other OSS that have used
Berkeley DB as its backend ... stuff like Postfix, Cyrus IMAP, Cyrus
SASL and sendmail come immediately to mind ... what 'alternatives' do they
have? I know in my case, we have PostgreSQL backing a large portion of
the stuff for Postfix/IMAP/SASL, but not everything has been extended to
allow for 'alternate backends' ... of course, nothing really prevents that
from happening if backed into a corner, but it does create for potential
disruption in the overall OSS community ;(

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2006-02-11 14:24:29 Re: PostgreSQL ad images
Previous Message Mike Ellsworth 2006-02-11 13:50:18 Re: PostgreSQL ad images