Re: sql row constructor...works!

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: sql row constructor...works!
Date: 2006-02-08 15:15:33
Message-ID: 20060208151532.GJ4474@ns.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog(at)svana(dot)org) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 07:49:32AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Sounds like a bug, will it be in 8.1.3 or do we have to wait till 8.2
> > for it? Sounds very interesting indeed...
>
> Well, the bug is really that we accept the syntax but do the wrong
> thing. I don't know when it was added but the quick fix would be to
> refuse the syntax. I think the changes to make it work were too large
> to be in a point release.

Ah, ok, I misunderstood. Looking forwrad to having it (and having it
work correctly!) in 8.2 :)

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Deugau 2006-02-08 15:52:22 Re: Actual expression of a constraint
Previous Message Tino Wildenhain 2006-02-08 15:09:00 Re: pg_hba.conf alternative