Re: sql row constructor...works!

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: sql row constructor...works!
Date: 2006-02-08 12:49:32
Message-ID: 20060208124932.GI4474@ns.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog(at)svana(dot)org) wrote:
> It's in CVS HEAD, not 8.1
>
> > It seems to me that (x,y) > (a,b) means (x > a AND y > b) ... which is
> > not exactly what you wanted... or I'm missing something ?
>
> Yes, it changed because someone pointed out that the behaviour in 8.1
> was wrong.

Sounds like a bug, will it be in 8.1.3 or do we have to wait till 8.2
for it? Sounds very interesting indeed...

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-02-08 12:56:01 Re: pg_hba.conf alternative
Previous Message Csaba Nagy 2006-02-08 12:45:09 Re: pg_hba.conf alternative