| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION |
| Date: | 2006-01-31 20:16:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20060131201613.GA7181@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paesold wrote:
> Perhaps not multiple connections, but multiple transactions per connection,
> like Oracle supports, AFAIK. All with a big ;-) of course. I doubt it would
> be easy to implement that. The assumption
> one-connection-has-one-transaction is probably pretty deeply burried in
> many backend components. Has this been changed by the prepared-transactions
> stuff? I may be mistaken, which would be very positive news.
No, you're not mistaken. The 2PC stuff works by reassigning the
transaction to a sort-of "phantom backend".
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre
"Llegará una época en la que una investigación diligente y prolongada sacará
a la luz cosas que hoy están ocultas" (Séneca, siglo I)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeffrey W. Baker | 2006-01-31 20:36:31 | Re: Configuration WAS: New project launched : PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-01-31 20:11:30 | Re: Configuration WAS: New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for |