Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Ron <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very
Date: 2006-01-27 01:00:55
Message-ID: 20060127010054.GD13501@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Ron wrote:
> At 01:27 PM 1/21/2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> >Ron <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net> writes:
> >> At 07:23 PM 1/20/2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Well, we're trying to split an index page that's gotten full into
> >>> two index pages, preferably with approximately equal numbers of items in
> >>> each new page (this isn't a hard requirement though).

> After reading the various papers available on GiST and RD trees, I
> think I have a decent suggestion.

I for one don't understand what does your suggestion have to do with the
problem at hand ... not that I have a better one myself.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/CTMLCN8V17R4
"Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra esté seca" (Orual)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich Shepard 2006-01-27 01:54:48 What Could Cause This Behavior?
Previous Message Ron 2006-01-27 00:18:35 Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2006-01-27 01:55:46 Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very
Previous Message Ron 2006-01-27 00:18:35 Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very