Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow
Date: 2006-01-21 00:05:19
Message-ID: 20060121000519.GA29755@uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 06:52:37PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's also worth considering that the entire approach is a heuristic,
> really --- getting the furthest-apart pair of seeds doesn't guarantee
> an optimal split as far as I can see. Maybe there's some totally
> different way to do it.

For those of us who don't know what tsearch2/gist is trying to accomplish
here, could you provide some pointers? :-) During my mini-literature-search
on Google, I've found various algorithms for locating clusters in
high-dimensional metric spaces[1]; some of it might be useful, but I might
just be misunderstanding what the real problem is.

[1] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/69/30435/01401892.pdf?arnumber=1401892 ,
for instance

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-21 00:23:10 Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow
Previous Message SunWuKung 2006-01-21 00:01:28 Re: standard normal cumulative distribution function

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-21 00:23:10 Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-20 23:52:37 Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow