| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL and case insensitivity... |
| Date: | 2006-01-17 22:40:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20060117224031.GH17896@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 04:02:26AM -0500, Robert Bernier wrote:
> On Monday 16 January 2006 15:30, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > The problem with using colation order is that it's database-wide. If you
> > then need case-sensitive ordering on some field you're outa luck. If you
> > could define colation on a per-field basis it would be a bit different.
> >
> > I'm also not sure what this has to do with advocacy...
>
>
> I posted here because of the nature of the question. Which mail-list do you think this is most appropriate?
-general; maybe -hackers if it was a specific call for action.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomka Gergely | 2006-01-18 07:41:09 | Re: Case studies (was: [PERFORM] big databases & |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-17 21:18:37 | Re: PostgreSQL and case insensitivity... |