Re: big databases & hospitals

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Tomka Gergely <tomka(at)zeus(dot)gau(dot)hu>
Cc: psql performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: big databases & hospitals
Date: 2006-01-17 20:36:24
Message-ID: 20060117203624.GC17896@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:13:02PM +0100, Tomka Gergely wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I need to write a few pages about Postgresql, to convince some suits. They
> have a few millions of records, on a few site, but they want to know the
> practical limits of Postgresql. So i need some information about the
> biggest (in storage space, in record number, in field number, and maybe
> table number) postgresql databases.
>
> Additionally, because this company develops hospital information systems,
> if someone knows about a medical institute, which uses Postgresql, and
> happy, please send me infomation. I only now subscribed to the advocacy
> list, and only started to browse the archives.

We have a customer that has around 5000 tables and hasn't had any
serious issues from that number of tables (other than \d sometimes not
working in psql, but IIRC Tom put a fix in for that already).

As for raw size, 100G databases are pretty common. If you search through
the list archives you can probably find some examples.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-01-17 20:40:44 Re: Ensuring data integrity with fsync=off
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-17 20:19:31 Re: Suspending SELECTs