Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Infrastructure monitoring

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Infrastructure monitoring
Date: 2006-01-14 21:49:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www

> > For those of you who haven't seen Hyperic, think of Nagios with a fancy
> > web UI including notification management, scheduled tasks, historical
> > reporting, and specific monitioring tools for PostgreSQL databases and
> > other common applications.    As a comparison,  Nagios::Hyperic -->
> > ed::vi  or amanda::Arkieka
> Which is all very nice but what would any of those features give us that we
> have any use for?

Hey, it's your bag ... if you don't want it, I won't ask about setting it up.

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2006-01-14 21:55:17
Subject: Re: Infrastructure monitoring
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2006-01-14 21:40:56
Subject: Re: Infrastructure monitoring

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group