Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Date: 2006-01-09 23:39:33
Message-ID: 200601092339.k09NdXf20766@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Is there a TODO here, even if the Perl folks are supposed to fix it?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >>I'm just about out of ideas and right out of time to spend on this.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >We could just file a Perl bug report and wait for them to fix it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> done
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-09 23:43:37 Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-01-09 23:19:20 Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)