Re: [HACKERS] status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...

We seem to be stuck on this patch. Hannu wrote it, Tom doesn't trust
it, and no one else is commenting.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hannu Krosing wrote:
> ?hel kenal p?eval, K, 2005-12-21 kell 09:50, kirjutas Hannu Krosing:
> > ?hel kenal p?eval, T, 2005-12-20 kell 17:18, kirjutas Tom Lane:
> > > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > > > i was just wondering about the status of hannu's concurrent vacuum patch.
> > > > are there any plans to integrate this
> > >
> > > I still don't trust it (assuming that you're thinking of the same patch
> > > I am).
> >
> > What could I do to increase your trust in it ?
> >
> > Could you think of any specific case it could break ? Or any specific
> > tests to check for it ?
> >
> > I attach the version of the patch for 8.1.0 for anyone interested in
> > checking it.
>
> It was pointed out to me that I did'nt.
>
> So here it is:
>
> ---------------
> Hannu
>

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073