| From: | "j(dot)random(dot)programmer" <javadesigner(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2dev-500.jdbc3 driver: PreparedStatement.toString() is buggy |
| Date: | 2005-12-19 23:36:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20051219233608.15135.qmail@web32002.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Oliver:
> I don't think the driver or the spec has ever
> claimed that toString()
> gives you a valid SQL statement.
True :-)
However, note that it *used* to do so. This is a
regression from the past driver. And it would
be nice to have anyway, won't it ?
Also note in the past, booleans would get
converted to '1' and stored in BIT columns.
With the latest driver, java booleans are sent as
the number 1 (no quotes) and thus cannot be
stored in a BIT column, in direct contradiction to
the JDBC spec. (that's a different issue, see my
other post but I have a feeling it may somehow
be related).
Best regards,
--j
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | j.random.programmer | 2005-12-19 23:41:36 | Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle boolean->BIT correctly |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-12-19 23:32:00 | Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle boolean->BIT |