Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options
Date: 2005-12-16 23:07:36
Message-ID: 20051216230736.GE28739@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >> Why use it around the whole file and not only around that particular
> >> table's operations?
>
> > You could. That just behaves slightly differently.
>
> pg_dump does not always produce all the commands affecting a single
> table together, so I don't think you can actually get the desired
> results --- certainly it would be a nontrivial amount of work to get
> any useful behavior like that.

Ah, quite true. I withdraw my comments then.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-17 02:44:19 Re: How much expensive are row level statistics?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-16 22:18:20 Re: Single-Transaction Utility options